Filed in archive
Research
by Rhys on July 13, 2006

According to a
new study, we do. Apparently, 'short' people, and people with 'short' legs are at a higher risk than their statuesque counterparts of developing the disease.
The length of a person's legs is an indicator of childhood nutrition, which may have long-lasting effects on health, note Dr. Keiko Asao and colleagues from Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Maryland. Short leg length and low leg length-to-height ratio are two indicators of suboptimal childhood development.
Well, then.
Though a definite pattern of short legs=diabetes was established in both women and men, the statistics were not high enough to warrant any significance. Which is scientific speak for, Here's another study just to freak you out.
What do you think: a possible diabetes breakthrough, or junk science?
Permalink: Does 'Short' Equal Diabetic?
Trackback: http://publish.creative-weblogging.com/publish/mt-tb.pl/29199
Mr Wong
Vote for Does 'Short' Equal Diabetic?:
|
Rating: 10.00 out of 4 vote(s) cast.
|
Response from:
zark
(01/27/07 6:36am)
nice post
Subscribe
Use the search to look for other interesting posts
| RSS | See all blog subscribe options |
|
What is RSS? | |
| Yahoo! |
|
| Addthis |
|
| Bloglines |
|
| Newsletter | |
| Follow us on Twitter! |









